The Economic and Social Themes in The War Against Spain

Frederick August Wenderoth 1875, Little Terrier
Image from the Wikipedia
Jules' dog, Bandito,  probably looked a lot like this

If Theodosia and the Pirates: The War Against Spain is really about what I say it's about, namely,  patriotism, unrequited love of country and how war should be financed, why is it that those themes come to the fore in the second half of the novel much  better than they do in the first? A reader asked me this, and it was an intriguing question that I had to think about for a moment.

I mean, the story starts with a boy, a dog, a mother and father, and a rebellious teenaged stepdaughter. At first, the larger themes are obscured by the daily grind of family life, the small conflicts that come up between husbands and wives, children and parents, and even dogs and their masters. Why did I do that? Because what I'm really interested in is what it means to be free, what slavery consists of, how best to achieve justice, and how this affects all people in their every day lives. So the War Against Spain is really not about the War Against Spain, so much as the war within each person against what is keeping him down. Then, once we understand what we want as individuals, we can band together with our natural allies to try to get that.

Minor themes that feed into the larger ones are:

•  What is piracy and how does it differ from privateering? What is cannibalism and how does it differ from eating? What is taxation and how does it differ from looting?
•  What is marriage and the place of women in a family? Why does society favor wives over daughters? How best to protect a family? 
•  What is justice? Why must it be swift? Why was dueling helpful? What sorts of wrongs should not be litigated?
•  What does the corporate structure of businesses have to do with our current problems in an industrialized society?
•  How did the Panic of 1819 come about?  How was it related to the Louisiana Purchase and the War of 1812?
• What is wage slavery and why was the North in favor of it?
•  What did Jean Laffite and Karl Marx have in common? 
• Why is the idea of egalitarianism so different today from what it was in the 19th century?

I am going to be addressing these themes in this blog from time to time, and when I do, I will link to the relevant blog post in this list. So if you want to see how all the minor themes relate to the big theme, come back and check for links.

For the time being, here is an interesting link to an article that gives us a small hint on how Das Kapital has been reinterpreted over the years.

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118024/piketty-and-marx-where-they-disagree

Jean Laffite considered himself a champion of  "liberal" thought. But  "liberal" back then meant something considerably different from what  "liberal" means today.

How Open Should We Be With Our Children?

How open should we be with our children? Should we share everything we know about life? Or should we leave some of it for the children to discover for themselves? Reading this post by Julie Deneen made me think about that question again.

http://juliedeneen.com/2014/05/21/abstinence-teaching-sexual-responsibility/

While this is not the central theme of Theodosia and the Pirates: The War Against Spain, it is one of the topics that I cover. How does one raise an independent and spirited young woman in the 19th century if one is a filibuster or a privateer? What should we tell our sons and daughters about love, sex, and personal responsibility? If we tell them too much, will it harm them? If we share too little, will they fall into avoidable traps?

Detail Representing Denise Laffite from a painting by Colleen Dick

Theodosia Burr Alston had a very devoted, liberal, open-minded father. He was not perfect, but he was honest with her to an unusual degree. After her mother's death, he did not remarry. He was a freethinker, and he brought up his daughter to question everything and accept nothing on faith.

http://www.historiaobscura.com/aaron-burr-as-a-father/

It is good to be honest with our children. But did Burr damage Theodosia in any way by letting her know that he had mistresses and that he frequented brothels? Would it have been easier for her to separate and individuate, if he had not freely shared with her so much about his life? As the teenagers nowadays like to say: TMI! She must, at times, have been deeply embarrassed by some of his letters from Europe.

Jean Laffite was also a father. But I think he was more the traditional type: providing well for his children, showing them affection when he met with them, but being gone for long periods of time and not discussing anything unseemly with them.

http://www.historiaobscura.com/jean-laffite-as-a-father/

So which is better: total honesty or a little bit of repression and subterfuge, avoiding full disclosure?

In my experience, people whose parents share a lot with them are actually more likely to be a little gun-shy and wary. Knowledge does not necessarily lead to experimentation. It can lead to being more picky and careful. It can also lead to delayed maturation, because without the drive to rebel against your parents, there is less of a desire to experiment and find out for yourself.

In my experience, more traditional-minded parents drive their children into early experimentation, which is why all the born-again Christians I know are actually not all that repressed in their behavior, and they only give lip service to the chastity they supposedly believe in. Unexpected motherhood comes often to the faithful.

But here's the irony: the unintentional results of the search for pleasure can be blessings in disguise. The safety and security that come from a lack of desire to experiment can actually be stultifying. So repressing your children and driving them to mature early may not be such a bad course of conduct, counter-intuitive as it sounds. You do not want them to never leave the nest and never have a life of their own, do you?

Both mothers and fathers can be guilty of too close a relationship with their children which hinders their emotional growth. While I did not depict this in my novel, historical accounts indicate that Jules Laffite, Jean's youngest surviving child, was so close to his mother, Emma Mortimore Laffite, that he did not marry until after she died.

Maybe, as with many other aspects of life, this calls for a happy medium. I don't think we should lie to our children, but we probably shouldn't share everything with them, either. And even if your instincts are to be open and honest, remember:  a little repression might just be the right thing, if you ever want to see grandchildren in your own lifetime!